| Julius Caesar Navigator Home | Selected Bibliography Home |
Thesis:
In his opening paragraph Jackson recounts the beginnings of a controversy
about the text of Julius Caesar :
What happened? Did Jonson misremember? Or did Jonson correctly
remember the actors' improvised version of what Shakespeare wrote?
Or did Jonson's ridicule inspire Shakespeare (or someone else) to
revise the lines?
Jackson reviews the positions of the participants in this
controversy, paying particular attention to the famous critic John
Dover Wilson, who believed that Jonson remembered correctly, and that
the lines showed Caesar's vainglorious illogic. Jackson himself
takes a middle course; he believes that the text underwent some
alteration, but he doesn't believe that Shakespeare meant to show
Caesar as illogical.
Bottom Line: Good review of an interesting textual problem.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Julius Caesar Navigator Home | Selected Bibliography Home |